How to check for overlapping intervals DRAFT
Working with intervals is a common task in programming, whether you’re dealing with time ranges, scheduling problems, or geometric computations. A key insight when working with intervals is that checking for the absence of an overlap is often much simpler than checking for all the ways an overlap can occur.
This post will first cover how to represent intervals in code, then dive into the logic for detecting overlaps.
What are intervals?
An interval represents a range between two points, and could be in a continuous or discrete domain.
A common way to write an interval is a pair of values [start, end]
where start ≤ end
.
This would be a so-called closed interval, where the end-value is included in the interval.
An alternative is [start, end)
, which denotes a half-open interval where the end
value is not included in the interval.1
Half-open intervals are very common in programming languages.
Some examples of intervals are
- Time intervals:
[9:00, 17:00]
(a work day) - Numeric ranges:
[1, 10)
(the digit 1, 2, 3, …, 9) - Date ranges:
[2025-01-01, 2025-12-31]
(all the days in the year 2025) - Temperature range:
[20°C, 25°C]
- …
Representing an interval
We will use Python as an example language, and will use plain integers as the underlying type. All the examples will use open intervals, as that is very common.
@dataclassclass Interval: """Interval from start to end (exclusive)""" start: int end: int
# Useful methods ...
Detecting overlap
One of the most common questions when working with intervals is: “Do these two intervals overlap?” Lets implement a method for this
@dataclassclass Interval: ...
def overlaps(self, other: Interval) -> bool: """ Return true iff and only if the two intervals overlap. """ # How to implement?
The straight-forward approach
Whenever one needs to make a Boolean condition, the easiest way is often to consider all the cases. So, let’s consider all the ways that two intervals may overlap. There are four distinct cases.
Case 1: self starts first, other overlaps end of self
Case 2: other starts first, self overlaps end of other
Case 3: self completely contains other
Case 4: other completely contains self
In all these cases, we can see that the intervals share at least one point in common. The challenge is to write a condition that captures all four cases correctly. Let’s translate it into code straight from the case analysis.
@dataclassclass Interval: ... def overlaps(self, other: Interval) -> bool: """ Return true iff and only if the two intervals overlap. """ return \ # Case 1 self.start <= other.start < self.end or # Case 2 self.start < other.end <= self.end or # Case 3 self.start < other.end <= other.end < self.end or # Case 4 other.start <= self.start <= self.end < other.end
This is a straightforward translation of the cases,
where the most tricky thing is to make sure that the handling of the half-open property is correct.
One thing to note though, is that by checking the endpoints of the blue other
interval in Case 1 and 2,
then we have also covered Case 3.
This means that due to short circuiting, we will never trigger Case 3.
In addition Case 4 is overly specific.
We only need to care about checking if the start-point of the green self
interval is in the blue other
interval.
Taking these observations into account, we can simplify the above condition to the following cases.
@dataclassclass Interval: ... def overlaps(self, other: Interval) -> bool: """ Return true iff and only if the two intervals overlap. """ return \ # Case 1 self.start <= other.start < self.end or # Case 2 self.start < other.end <= self.end or # Case 4 (simplified) other.start <= self.start < other.end
With a case-analysis and some careful considerations, we have a nice expression that captures overlapping intervals. But checking overlap feels like something that should be obvious, and this condition is not that obvious. Checking for overlap of two intervals also feels like it shouldn’t reduce down to three cases. From that argument, we can intuit that it should be possible to simplify this even more.
Can we make a simpler condition, that is also easy to find?
Flipping the script
The core insight is that sometimes it is much easier to check for the negation of a property than the original property. For overlap, the negation is checking if two intervals are not overlapping. Let’s look at the cases we have now instead.
Case 1: self is before other
Case 2: other is before self
There are only two ways the two intervals are not overlapping, and this is much easier to translate into code.
@dataclassclass Interval: ... def overlaps(self, other: Interval) -> bool: """ Return true iff and only if the two intervals overlap. """ return not ( # Case 1 self.end <= other.start or # Case 2 other.end <= self.start )
Using De Morgan’s law it is possible to push the negation in. In addition, negated comparisons can be flipped simplifying this even further.
@dataclassclass Interval: ... def overlaps(self, other: Interval) -> bool: """ Return true iff and only if the two intervals overlap. """ return ( other.start < self.end and self.start < other.end )
This is finally a nice and simple expression that checks just two properties. By changing our viewpoint from checking for an overlap to checking against one, we deduced the correct expression much more easily.
Adding a second dimension
An interval is a one-dimensional property. A very natural extension is to instead consider two-dimensional properties. Representing a box is very similar to an interval, here we go from top and left (inclusive) to bottom and right (exclusive).
@dataclassclass Box: """Box from (left, top) to (right, bottom) (exclusive)""" left: int right: int bottom: int top: int
# Useful methods ...
Case analysis for overlap
Checking for overlap is equally important for boxes as it is for intervals. Let’s start by making a full case analysis of all the variants for how two boxes can overlap.
Case 1: other left+below, ends inside
Case 2: other left, ends inside; contained vertically
Case 3: other left+above, ends inside
Case 4: other left, ends inside; contains vertically
Case 5: other contained horizontally; starts below, ends inside
Case 6: other fully contained in self
Case 7: other contained horizontally; starts inside, ends above
Case 8: other contains self horizontally; overlaps vertically
Case 9: other right+below, starts inside
Case 10: other right, starts inside; contained vertically
Case 11: other right+above, starts inside
Case 12: other right, starts inside; contains vertically
Case 13: other contains horizontally; starts below, ends inside
Case 14: other contains horizontally; contained vertically
Case 15: other contains horizontally; starts inside, ends above
Case 16: other completely contains self
This does not inspire confidence in getting understandable code, let’s not even attempt it.
Negation to the rescue again
Using the same idea as for intervals, let’s look at the cases where two boxes do not overlap.
Case 1: other is to the left of self
Case 2: other is to the right of self
Case 3: other is above self
Case 4: other is below self
This is quite easy, the other box can be to the left, right, above, or below. It if it is to the left, it does not matter how much (or at all) the box overlaps in the vertical direction. Translating this into straightforward code as before.
@dataclassclass Box: ... def overlaps(self, other: Box) -> bool: """ Return true iff and only if the two boxes overlap. """ return not ( # Case 1 self.right <= other.left or # Case 2 other.right <= self.left or # Case 3 self.top <= other.bottom or # Case 4 other.bottom <= self.top )
Using the same analysis as before, we can use De Morgan’s laws to change the implementation to not start with a not.
@dataclassclass Box: ... def overlaps(self, other: Box) -> bool: """ Return true iff and only if the two boxes overlap. """ return ( other.left < self.right and self.left < other.right and other.bottom < self.top and self.top < other.bottom )
Conclusion
Figuring out the best way to express a property can be tricky. For intervals, while one can sit down and think thoroughly to find the best way to express the overlaps property, it is not easy. Using case analysis is the straight-forward way to create these but it can easily lead to an overly complicated and error-prone expression. This is especially clear for the box case, where there are 16 different cases to handle.
Using negation as a trick to simplify the case analysis works really well here. Naturally, it doesn’t always work out this well, but when it does it is a technique that is worth keeping in mind.
Footnotes
-
Note that these notations may vary, in France for example the notation is different. Thanks to jcelerier for pointing this out. ↩